The AI Paradox: Layoffs Surge, Yet Engineers Thrive

In May 2025, tech layoffs hit their highest single-month total in years, with AI cited as the primary reason. Yet new data from venture firm SignalFire reveals a stark contradiction: engineering roles are the most resilient in the tech workforce. Total hiring across large tech companies dropped 25% compared to 2019 levels, but engineering hiring declined only 11%. At the 12 companies SignalFire classifies as "Tech Majors"—including Alphabet, Meta, Apple, Amazon, Microsoft, Nvidia, and others—engineers now comprise 55% of all new hires, up from 46% in 2019. Early-stage startups actually increased engineering hiring by 7% over the same period.

This data challenges the narrative that AI is replacing software engineers. Instead, it suggests a more complex dynamic: AI is augmenting engineers, making them more productive, and thereby increasing demand for their skills. As Asher Bantock, SignalFire's head of research, notes, "They’re suddenly a lot more productive, and there’s endless work for them to do." This is a classic example of the Jevons paradox—greater efficiency leads to greater consumption, not less.

Why Engineering Hiring Defies the AI Doom Narrative

SignalFire's analysis tracked millions of employees across more than 80 million companies, focusing on hiring data rather than layoffs, which are often underreported. The findings are clear: while AI is displacing some roles, engineering is not among them. In fact, the opposite is happening. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang stated in April that all engineers at Nvidia now use agentic AI, and "software engineers are busier than ever." Anthropic's own head of economics, Peter McCrory, told TechCrunch in March that he had not seen any significant AI-driven effects on the workforce, even among roles most exposed to AI like software engineers.

The resilience of engineering roles can be attributed to several factors. First, AI tools are still imperfect and require human oversight. Second, the demand for software—and for AI-powered features—is growing exponentially. Third, companies are investing heavily in AI infrastructure, which requires engineers to build, maintain, and improve. As a result, engineers with AI skills are in particularly high demand.

Winners and Losers in the AI-Driven Labor Market

The data reveals a clear bifurcation in the tech labor market. Engineers, especially those with AI expertise, are winners. They are seeing increased demand, higher compensation, and greater job security. Early-stage startups are also winners, as they are able to attract engineering talent that might otherwise go to Big Tech. The Tech Majors themselves benefit from a stronger technical core, which enables them to innovate faster.

Losers include non-engineering white-collar workers, such as those in administrative, support, and routine cognitive roles. Overall hiring is down 25%, and AI is frequently cited as a reason for layoffs. Entry-level job seekers without AI skills face a particularly challenging environment, as Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei warned that AI could eliminate half of all entry-level white-collar jobs within five years. Companies heavily reliant on routine tasks—like data entry, customer service, and basic content creation—are also at risk.

Strategic Implications for Companies and Investors

For companies, the message is clear: invest in engineering talent, especially those with AI skills. The shift toward hiring more engineers (55% of new hires at Tech Majors) indicates that technical core is becoming more critical to competitive advantage. Companies that fail to attract and retain engineering talent risk falling behind in the AI race.

Advertisement

For investors, the data suggests that startups focused on AI tools for engineers or AI-native products are well-positioned. The increase in engineering hiring at early-stage startups (7% growth) signals that innovation is happening outside of Big Tech. Venture capital should flow toward companies that can leverage AI to augment their engineering teams, not replace them.

For policymakers, the findings underscore the need to reskill workers for an AI-augmented economy. While engineers are thriving, other white-collar workers face displacement. Programs that teach AI literacy and technical skills will be essential to maintaining workforce participation.

The Jevons Paradox in Action: More AI, More Engineers

The Jevons paradox—where increased efficiency leads to increased consumption—is playing out in real time. AI makes engineers more productive, which lowers the cost of software development. This, in turn, increases demand for software, leading to more engineering work. As Bantock put it, "There’s endless work for them to do." This dynamic is likely to continue as AI tools become more powerful and widespread.

However, this does not mean all engineers are safe. Those who fail to adapt to AI tools may find themselves at a disadvantage. The demand is for engineers who can work alongside AI, not those who resist it. Companies like Nvidia are already requiring all engineers to use agentic AI, setting a precedent for the industry.

Outlook: What to Watch in the Next 30 Days

Over the next month, key indicators to monitor include hiring data from major tech companies, especially for engineering roles. Any significant deviation from the trend—such as a sudden drop in engineering hiring—could signal a shift. Also watch for earnings calls where CEOs discuss AI's impact on headcount. Finally, keep an eye on policy announcements regarding AI and workforce development, as governments begin to respond to the labor market disruption.




Source: TechCrunch AI

Rate the Intelligence Signal

Intelligence FAQ

No, current data shows engineering hiring is more resilient than other functions. Engineers are being augmented, not replaced, by AI.

AI increases productivity, which lowers costs and expands the scope of software projects. This creates more work, not less, for engineers.

Engineers who do not adapt to AI tools may face obsolescence. Those with AI expertise are in highest demand.

Invest in engineering talent, especially those skilled in AI. Reskill non-engineering roles to work alongside AI systems.

As long as AI continues to augment rather than fully automate complex tasks, demand for engineers will remain strong. The Jevons paradox suggests this could persist for years.