The Core Shift: Base Power's End-Run Around PJM's Broken Queue
Base Power's expansion into Illinois marks a direct assault on the largest U.S. grid operator, PJM Interconnection. The startup is not waiting for interconnection approvals; it is deploying behind the meter, where residential connections already exist. This bypasses a queue that PJM itself froze from 2022 until April 2025, a period when electricity demand skyrocketed. The result: wholesale prices in PJM have nearly doubled, and AEP has threatened to exit. Base Power's timing is impeccable, and its strategy reveals a blueprint for VC-backed energy disruption.
Strategic Consequences: Who Gains, Who Loses, and What Shifts
The Winners
Base Power: With $1.2 billion in funding from a16z, Lightspeed, and Addition, Base Power has the capital to scale rapidly. Its 500+ MWh of operating storage in Texas proves the model. In Illinois, it offers rates 25% below ComEd, undercutting the incumbent on price while building a virtual power plant that can arbitrage wholesale markets. The PJM market, with its data center-driven demand and high prices, is a perfect growth environment.
Illinois Residents: They gain access to cheaper electricity without upfront battery costs. Base Power's model requires customers to buy electricity from it, not the battery, aligning incentives for grid optimization.
PJM Interconnection: Despite its regulatory failures, PJM desperately needs new capacity. Base Power's distributed batteries can respond faster than new gas plants, helping stabilize a grid under strain from data center load.
The Losers
ComEd: Losing customers to a 25% cheaper competitor is a direct revenue threat. ComEd's regulated model cannot easily match Base Power's flexibility or pricing.
AEP: Already threatening to exit PJM, AEP faces further margin compression as distributed storage eats into peak pricing opportunities. Its traditional utility model is ill-suited to compete with VC-backed disruptors.
Traditional Utilities in PJM: The entire sector faces a structural shift. Base Power's model – residential batteries aggregated into a virtual power plant – can scale without building new transmission lines or power plants. This is a direct threat to the utility business model.
Outlook & Next Steps: Second-Order Consequences
Base Power's entry will accelerate regulatory pressure on PJM to modernize its interconnection processes. Expect other VC-backed storage startups to follow. Data center operators in Northern Virginia will gain a new, potentially cheaper, and more reliable power source. However, incumbent utilities will lobby for regulatory barriers, arguing that behind-the-meter batteries bypass reliability standards. The next 12 months will see a battle over net metering rules and virtual power plant compensation in PJM.
For investors, Base Power's model is a blueprint for disrupting regulated utilities. The key risk is regulatory backlash. For utilities, the playbook is clear: either partner with or acquire distributed storage startups, or face disintermediation.
Rate the Intelligence Signal
Intelligence FAQ
By installing batteries behind the meter at residential homes, which already have grid connections. This avoids the lengthy and frozen interconnection queue for new generation sources.
Wholesale electricity prices in PJM have nearly doubled due to data center demand and a lack of new generation. Base Power can charge batteries when prices are low and dispatch when high, capturing the spread.
Regulatory backlash from incumbent utilities and potential changes to net metering or virtual power plant rules. Also, reliance on continued VC funding for expansion.


